What this site does not say
A site critical of border-control failure will be quoted by people making larger claims. These are the claims this site's data does not support — stated here once, plainly, so nobody can honestly cite us for them.
It does not say migrants are the problem.
The failure documented here is a failure of the state: a border it does not control, a backlog it let reach 175,457, accommodation contracts re-estimated at three times their original cost, and an enforcement system that removes a fraction of those with no right to remain. None of that is an indictment of any individual seeking a better life, and this site never uses it as one.
It does not say most migration is illegal.
It is not. Irregular arrivals are a small fraction of total migration to the UK, most of which is visa-issued and lawful — see the ONS's long-term international migration statistics for the whole picture. This site covers the illegal and irregular side, and the arrivals page quantifies the legal humanitarian routes alongside it for scale.
It does not say foreign nationals in prison are irregular migrants.
Prison nationality is not immigration status. ‘Foreign national’ includes people living in the UK entirely lawfully, and the crime page says so above its own figures. No statistic on that page supports an inference about irregular migrants from prison totals alone.
It does not say any community is responsible for group-based child sexual exploitation.
The inquiry findings quoted on the integration page concern specific criminal networks and the institutions that failed to confront them. Where local data showed over-representation of particular groups of men, the site quotes the inquiry verbatim with a page reference; where the national data was too poor to support conclusions, it quotes that too. Both inquiries condemned the failure to collect the data — demanding better data is not a statement about any community.
It does not say Prevent referrals measure extremism among Muslims.
Referrals are concerns raised with a safeguarding programme — not offences, arrests or convictions — and the categories are the Home Office's own. Islamist extremism is an ideology; nothing in those figures is a statement about British Muslims generally, and this site does not use them as one.
It does not construct rates the sources don't publish.
No invented ‘removal rate’, no offending-per-population rates by nationality, no cross-cohort ratios. Where two figures from different cohorts appear side by side — as arrivals and enforced returns do on the homepage — the site says explicitly that they are shown for scale, not as a ratio.
It does not endorse anyone.
No party, no campaign, no movement. The site publishes numbers with sources on the cadence the statistics are published, and its corrections log applies to itself first.